The Downsides of Shooting in Raw and Solutions
Whenever young photographers ask me to discuss ideas, I tell them two things. First, ensure your camera bag always includes a charger; I carry my personal favorite LI-90B charger with me wherever I go. Second, always try and shoot in RAW. However, to shoot in RAW and obtain desired photos, you should also know the downsides of RAW files. The section below would introduce you to those downsides and would provide you effective solutions.
You will need to process the RAW files
Many photographers avoid shooting in RAW as processing RAW files is required. However, the fact is that a lot of them find yourself processing even the JPEG files. This automatically helps to make the argument against shooting in See More. What’s more, even if you process JPEG files, you simply will not get results as amazing as what you would get upon processing RAW files. Doing change like white balance adjustment and highlights or shadow recovery is easier with RAW files. Another great advantage of RAW files is the fact, they could be exported into JPEG seamlessly; additionally, it will be possible to transform them into various sizes according to your preferences. In short, when you shoot in RAW, you will have much more options.
RAW files occupy extra space
As the quantity of uncompressed information held in RAW files is quite a bit more, these files might occupy two to three times more space compared to the JPEGs. This might cause problems for photographers, particularly those who need to capture photos in bulk. However, I believe that today this shouldn’t become a problem anymore; days gone by couple of years have observed significant drop within the prices of hardrives. Today, you can purchase a high quality 3TB drive simply by spending around $130. One dexupky13 should accommodate around 100,000 RAW files. As being a professional photographer, you shouldn’t avoid spending a modest amount of $130 for enjoying the advantages of shooting in RAW. The costs of memory cards are also dropping pretty regularly. There was a time once we were required to spend more money than $200 for purchasing a 2GB storage device. Presently, you can get a 4GB card just for $15.
RAW files can slow the digital camera
Because of being bigger in size, the RAW files unlike the JPEGs top off camera buffers much quicker. It’s correct that the digital camera will shoot exactly the same number of frames per second for both JPEG and RAW files. However, in the event the camera buffer is full, the camera might require a few extra minutes for sending the images to the storage device. So, when shooting a speedy sequence in RAW, you should use a faster storage device. You can even invest in a pricier camera that will have a bigger buffer.
The above mentioned discussion reveals that there might be some demerits of shooting in RAW, but none can successfully overpower the massive benefits made available from RAW files. Furthermore, each of those problems has suitable and easy to accomplish solutions. So, there’s no reason why a photographer would avoid shooting in RAW.